|
Post by A's GM on Feb 12, 2006 14:26:38 GMT -5
i think that we should have one and it should be made up of a mixture of gm's
|
|
|
Post by Mariners GM/Commish on Feb 12, 2006 14:30:33 GMT -5
It's already been decided by League Officials to not have one, so there is little to no point in this poll
|
|
|
Post by Dodgersgm on Feb 12, 2006 14:33:18 GMT -5
i think that we should have one and it should be made up of a mixture of gm's Who the hell are you to tell us what the league needs? If you don't like the league then leave.
|
|
|
Post by jamesbond586/detroit city on Feb 12, 2006 14:45:56 GMT -5
we actually should
|
|
|
Post by Dodgersgm on Feb 12, 2006 14:55:17 GMT -5
Tell us why we should have one.
|
|
|
Post by jamesbond586/detroit city on Feb 12, 2006 15:03:44 GMT -5
so there r not lopsided deals
|
|
|
Post by Mariners GM/Commish on Feb 12, 2006 15:08:25 GMT -5
I don't think we should be having people tell GMs what's fair and not or what's good or not for their team. If they are stupid enough to make a stupid deal they should live with the consequences. I don't think we have anyone like that though.
|
|
|
Post by MLBL007 on Feb 12, 2006 16:03:18 GMT -5
If it is to bad of a deal, i think commish will see that and disapprove that. But it would have to be a deal like Willie Bloomquist for Albert Pujuols.
|
|
draysgm
New Member
Big Shot
Posts: 15
|
Post by draysgm on Feb 12, 2006 17:56:52 GMT -5
I agree with Dodgersgm, and the commish.
|
|
|
Post by Mariners GM/Commish on Feb 12, 2006 18:01:05 GMT -5
If it is to bad of a deal, i think commish will see that and disapprove that. But it would have to be a deal like Willie Bloomquist for Albert Pujuols. Well yeah, it could be more fair than that. If there are multiple complaints before it's approved or it's obviously completely unfair, it'll be dissapproved.
|
|
|
Post by A's GM on Feb 12, 2006 18:19:57 GMT -5
i think that we should have one and it should be made up of a mixture of gm's Who the hell are you to tell us what the league needs? If you don't like the league then leave. dude dont shit ur pants, im only making a suggestion
|
|
|
Post by cardinalsgm on Feb 12, 2006 21:04:35 GMT -5
I agree with A's GM. I have a Trade Council for my league, and have ever since it began 2 years ago. You want a reason to have a TC? The reason I have one is to save the integrity of the league. You can have a GM or two make bad deals and leave their team in shambles, and then just leave the league. That GM won't have to deal with the mistakes that he made, the furute GM will have to. The league then has a team that has can't compete with the others, and you'll have a very hard time finding a GM that wants to take over a team like that. In my opinion, a Trade Council is a very good idea.
|
|
|
Post by The Brew Crew on Feb 14, 2006 9:43:23 GMT -5
I might agree to a trade checker but no to a trade council.
|
|
|
Post by cardinalsgm on Feb 18, 2006 15:41:55 GMT -5
So you would agree to one person having power over one of your trades as to a group of them. No thank you. A small jury of your peers is much better than one person that is the judge, jury, and executioner.
|
|
|
Post by The Brew Crew on Feb 18, 2006 19:06:53 GMT -5
No, i dont think trades will get out of hand is all. Im just talking about trade checkers for really bad deals.
|
|